The Jon Schneider Game of the Year awards: 2025

As has become my annual tradition, here's the list of my favorite computer and console video games that I played for the first time during 2025 (along with the platform(s) that I played them on)!

1. Hades 2 (Windows)

I really don't know how Supergiant Games does it. The original Hades was my personal 2020 Game of the Year, with its combination of tight top-down-view action combat, great voice-acted characters and character development, and excellent music. Hades 2 delivers more of the same, except with even more interesting combat and varied gameplay. I put in the time to 100% the Hades 2 Steam achievements, and enjoyed every run. 

There's certainly something special about a game where -- despite there being no gameplay benefit or purpose to it -- you can opt to spend some time having your character join in and beautifully harmonize with a song that another character visiting your home base is singing.

2. StarVaders (Windows, Steam Deck)

Like it says on the tin, StarVaders is a roguelike deckbuilder that takes place on a Space-Invaders-like battle map. Cards are used to make your upward-facing spaceship move and fire up at the alien invaders moving down to attack you. Game balance is solid; and lots of different character classes, character variants, difficulty levels, and missions provide lots of replayability. Recommended for fans of Slay the Spire and similar games! 

3. Metaphor ReFantazio (Windows, Steam Deck)

Although I'm not a big "AAA" game player, Metaphor ReFantazio hit a sweet spot for me with its "Persona, but in a unique swords and sorcery fantasy setting" gameplay. I played all the way through the ending during the first few months of 2025.

4. Mario Kart World (Switch 2)

I particularly like the new Knockout Tour mode (in single-player) -- it really takes advantage of Mario Kart World's interconnected world to delivery a fun continuous 15 minutes or so of racing. Mario Kart World is also 2025's Schneider Family Game of the Year, managing the rare feat of getting us playing a video game together in 4-player split-screen. 

5. Monster Train 2 (Windows, Steam Deck)

Just as with Hades 2: Monster Train 2 is like the original, but more and better! I had a good time discovering Monster Train 2's various synergies, both within the various factions, and in the intra-faction combination pairings. And I particularly enjoyed the major content unlock that occurs midway through the game. 

6. 8-Bit Adventures 2 (Steam Deck, Windows)

My favorite classic-style turn-based RPG of 2025! A wholesome save-the-world adventure with likeable characters. I haven't played the original (but plan to circle back to it soon, as the developer, Critical Games, added Steam Cloud saving to the Steam version, at my request!!) I played all the way through to the end. Recommended for fans of classic-style JRPG-like games! 

7. Donkey Kong Bananza (Switch 2)

Here begins the portion of this year's list of games that I was impressed by and enjoyed, but didn't yet make it all the way through to completion. Bananza certainly meets the "impressed me" criterion, with its preponderance of destructible terrain combined with solid 3D platforming level design. I like how powerful DK feels in this game: In Mario games, Mario generally needs to be pretty cautious of enemies; by contrast, DK can readily clobber just about anything he comes across! 

8. Tactical Breach Wizards (Windows)

First off: Tactical Breach Wizards features the wittiest writing in a video game that I've come across in my long history as a gamer, so it's got that going for it! Beyond that, the world imagined by Tactical Breach Wizards -- a modern world, but where magic is real, and thus is the primary tool employed by special-forces agents -- is a great playground for the turn-based tactical combat gameplay. I'm currently enjoying making my way through this game in short sessions of a mission or three each morning before work, mouse in my right hand, coffee in left.

9. Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 (Windows)

I probably needn't explain much about the game that has already featured so prominently on so many 2025 awards and Game of the Year lists. I feel like I should have liked the game's turn-based combat (but with dodges requiring real-time reflexes) more than I did -- Paper Mario (N64) and Thousand-Year Door are both on my all-time favorites list -- but I never was quite able to really get the hang of dodging terribly reliably, and 33 seems to want you to be pretty good at dodging in able to be successful in combat.  I made it a fair ways into the game, but didn't end up completing it. 

10. Rift of the Necrodancer (Windows, Steam Deck) 

I'm a bit of a fan of Cadence (including her Hyrule appearance), and so was looking forward to Rift! I spent a fair bit of time with it when it came out, and did play all the way through the story. I'm (evidently) not super talented at this game, though, and topped out at Medium difficulty on most songs, and Hard on the easier ones. 

(However -- and since this is my blog, I'll just go right ahead and dad-brag a bit -- my 20-year-old son is the current #1 world record holder of multiple Rift songs in "Impossible" difficulty on the Switch platform, and also has a bunch of top-percentile scores on the Steam platform -- despite carrying an otherwise-full load as a Chemical Engineering major and marching band member at university!) 

(Aside: New game developers, consider resisting the temptation to include the word "Rift" in the name of your new game. There are quite a few such games out there already! 😅) 

Appendix: NOT-new-in-2025 Multiplayer GOTY

My continuing-favorite game of 2025 was once again Super Smash Bros. Ultimate on the Switch! The aforementioned 20-year-old son and I enjoy playing the online 2v2 mode and taking on all comers -- and, per the in-game stats, managing to win matches at a ~85% clip! I'm decent at Smash and generally hold up my end of the team with my Bowser Jr. and Samus; but "20" (who can skillfully play the entire roster(!), but probably likes best Lucina, Mii Brawler, and Pyra/Mythra) definitely does most of the heavy lifting! 

Appendix: Games in Progress

Fields of Mistria (Windows, Steam Deck)

Field of Mistria is essentially Stardew Valley, but different! I spent a solid few weeks with this game midway through the year, and enjoyed some of the changes and improvements it makes on Stardew Valley. I decided to put the game back on the shelf for now, though, pending the rest of the planned content (including the full implementation of PC-NPC relationships) being added to the game. Hopefully that'll be later on in 2026!

CrossCode (Windows, Steam Deck)

Although CrossCode is a somewhat older game -- having come out in 2018 -- I just discovered it in December 2025, it having been one of a few inexpensive games that I picked up in the Steam Winter Sale. (I think I may have tried but bounced off of a CrossCode demo back around the original release date.) Wow, there's a lot I'm liking here so far. A twin-stick action-adventure game (like my 2024 GOTY, Minishoot' Adventures)! A simulated MMORPG game, bringing back some fond memories of when I casually played World of Warcraft in its early days? Pixel art? Firm but fair puzzles? An intriguing story? There's a lot here so far that falls pretty squarely in my personal wheelhouse!

At times, CrossCode has felt like it may wind up earning a place among my favorite games of all time! At other times, it has been a little frustrating or obscure. I've managed to play through to what feels like it might be about the halfway mark without resorting to any hint guides, though, so far. I'm looking forward to continuing to play in 2026, forming a fuller opinion --  and maybe featuring CrossCode in my 2026 GOTY list post!

N+1 query problem? More like 1+N query problem!

Some years back, when I first learned about the N+1 query problem, I had a little bit of difficulty wrapping my mind around it -- or at least the naming of it. Inadvertently making lots of round trips to the database is bad, sure. And the problem gets a lot worse when you have record counts in the thousands (or more) instead of just a handful, sure. But why are we calling this "N+1"?

I eventually realized that the problem is that the nomenclature is backwards, chronologically! The order of operations happening when this problem gets triggered is:

1. The database is queried for a list of records. (1 query)
2. For each of those records, a follow-up query is made. (N queries)

I started thinking of the problem instead as the "1+N query problem." And for me, at least, the naming immediately became much more intuitive to grasp!

 

A quick perusal of search results makes it clear that this is a pretty #unpopularopinion. Almost all of the discussion of this problem out there exclusively uses the "N+1" terminology. 

I'm going to keep saying "1+N" in conversations with peers, though. I don't mind being one man standing against the tide on this specific issue! 🌊👨‍💻

TimeSnapper for Mac: Custom Directory Selection Now Available!

TimeSnapper for Mac has been updated to allow a custom directory to be selected for your captured screen images!

If you're not already familiar with TimeSnapper, it's a utility that runs in the background on your Mac or PC and saves an image of your screen(s) (or just the active application window) every few seconds. This can be highly useful when, to take a few examples: 

• A piece of text you were composing got lost because your browser crashed, or because a web form submit failed. (Retrieve the text out of your screenshot history!) 
• You want to search up information about a specific error message that you encountered a few minutes ago, for which you don't remember the exact wording. (Again, it'll be waiting for you in your screenshot history!) 
• You want to remember what all you were working on the afternoon of two days ago. (Click and drag across the TimeSnapper timeline UI to pan through your screenshot history!)  

Previously, the Mac version of TimeSnapper saved your screen images to subfolders of a particular "sandboxed" directory that the TimeSnapper app was by default permitted to access. This worked, but the target folder was in a fairly deep location on the MacOS filesystem, and thus was inconvenient to access by any means other than the "View in Finder" button in TimeSnapper's Preferences window.

Now, starting in version 1.1.0, TimeSnapper for Mac has been enhanced to use security-scoped bookmarks to allow you to choose any folder on your local computer for TimeSnapper to use to save its screen images. 

To use the new feature, after updating your copy of TimeSnapper to the latest version via the Mac App Store, click on the TimeSnapper icon in your Mac's top menu bar, then select Preferences, then the Auto Cleanup tab in the Preferences window. You'll see a "Change folder..." button in that window. 

 

If you aren't already using TimeSnapper, take a look at the reviews and ratings (4.8 out of 5 stars as of today!) of TimeSnapper on the Mac App Store, and treat your personal productivity to a lifetime license for a quite reasonably low price!

Fix: Large file upload tests in a Rails app start failing after bumping rack to 3.0.16

Problem: After bumping the Rack gem in a Rails app from 3.0.14 to 3.0.16, a couple of tests which tested an HTTP POST of a large-ish (~30 MB) PDF file to a controller started failing. Other similar tests, which did not upload a large file, continued passing.

The failure symptom was the POST returning an HTTP 400 Bad Request error. The error was returned before the request made it to any of our application code (as evidenced by none of our breakpoints being hit, or debug statements appearing in the output log).  

For our particular test, the specific error message was: Minitest::Assertion: Expected response to be a <413: payload_too_large>, but was a <400: Bad Request>

Fortunately, there were no other gem dependencies that came with the bump of Rack to 3.0.16. So we knew the problem must be caused by some change in Rack 3.0.15 or 3.0.16. 

Solution: The single item in the rack 3.0.16 release notes did turn out to be the pertinent change:

Security: CVE-2025-46727 Unbounded parameter parsing in Rack::QueryParser can lead to memory exhaustion.

As that linked advisory mentions, a new check is added in rack 3.0.16 that turns away "extremely large" application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies. From this nist.gov page on CVE-2025-46727, links were available to the fix's specific code changes. From the first linked change, we can see that a "BYTESIZE_LIMIT" of 4194304 (a little over 4 MB) is now imposed on application/x-www-form-urlencoded request bodies. 

Per the mozilla.org page on HTTP POST, application/x-www-form-urlencoded is only one possible form Content-Type HTTP header value -- and not the one that is supposed to be used with binary data, such as PDF file uploads! Instead, multipart/form-data should be used.

Our original unit test code was actually not specifying any Content-Type HTTP header value in our test POST request. Changing the test's POST request to additionally send the HTTP header Content-Type: multipart/form-data fixed the problem, and got our test passing once again.

Aside: When I spent a minute during the investigation to ask ChatGPT about this problem -- a POST request failure introduced as of Rack 3.0.16, possibly due to a large request payload -- ChatGPT obligingly hallucinated up a plausible-sounding (but 100% fictional) response about Rack introducing a default limit in POST request payload size, and a corresponding plausible-sounding (but 100% fictional) response about a configuration line to be added to config/applicaiton.rb to override the supposed new behavior. 😂🙄

Yet another use case for LIFO stacks (humor)

This is like what happens while I'm working on a coding project at my job on an unfortunately-often basis. Anyone else? 😂